Background
Mucinous tumors represent a spectrum within ovarian tumors, comprising 15% of all ovarian neoplasms. They are less common than their serous counterparts. There are some interesting associations with these tumors and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. In addition, there may be co-existing Brenner tumors or a dermoid cyst, usually with benign mucinous cystadenomas.
Like serous tumors of the ovary, the critical question which must be answered by the pathologist is whether stromal invasion is present, making the tumor a carcinoma. Most investigators suggest that invasion should be diagnosed only in the presence of the following:
Nuclei of the lining cells are stratified to four layers or more
Cribriform pattern or presence of stroma-free papillaeThese criteria are applicable only for intestinal type borderline tumors. Mullerian type tumors, on the other hand, may show cellular stratification up to 20 layers.
TUMOR TYPE AGE OF PRESENTATION PERCENTAGE OF TUMORS Benign cystadenomas 3-5th decades 85% Borderline malignancy 4-7th decades 6-10% Cystadenocarcinomas 4-7th decades 5-10% Associated with all mucinous tumors are occasional stromal nodules usually composed of a high grade carcinoma. Occasional, these mural nodules may resemble a sarcoma. These nodules are sharply demarcated. In spite of the ominous histologic appearance, the prognosis for these patients is unchanged from the primary tumor prognosis.
The pathologist must differentiate these tumors from endometrioid carcinomas. Since squamous differentiation is very rare in mucinous tumors, this feature would favor an endometrioid carcinoma. In addition, some metastatic adenocarcinomas to the ovary may be difficult to exclude. Features favoring a metastasis inlcude metastatic implants on the surface of the ovary and prominent vascular invasion. There may be a mixture of mucinous epithelial types and more goblet cells in primary mucinous tumors.
OUTLINE
DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS CHARACTERIZATION MATURE CYSTIC TERATOMAS
Ovarian Mucinous Tumors Associated With Mature Cystic Teratomas: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis Identifies a Subset of Potential Teratomatous Origin That Shares Features of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Mucinous Tumors More Commonly Encountered as Secondary Tumors in the Ovary.*Departments of Pathology and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD †PhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle, WA §Department of Pathology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA ‡Department of GYN and Breast Pathology, AFIP, Washington, DC ∥Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Jun;31(6):854-869. Abstract quote
Most primary ovarian mucinous tumors are of surface epithelial-stromal origin and exhibit diffuse expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7) combined with variable expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK20); this immunoprofile distinguishes them from most lower gastrointestinal tract tumors secondarily involving the ovaries.
The uncommon ovarian mucinous tumors of germ cell (teratomatous) origin have not been extensively evaluated to determine the utility of these markers and other markers of intestinal differentiation for distinguishing these tumors from metastatic gastrointestinal tract mucinous tumors. Immunohistochemical expression of CK7, CK20, CDX2, and villin was assessed in 44 ovarian mucinous tumors associated with a mature cystic teratoma.
All cases lacked evidence of a nonovarian primary mucinous tumor. All mucinous tumors were unilateral; 6 cases had bilateral teratomas. All tumors displayed gastrointestinal-type mucinous differentiation, with epithelium that was commonly goblet cell-rich or hypermucinous; 21 were associated with pseudomyxoma ovarii and 3 of these had pseudomyxoma peritonei. Tumor architecture ranged from purely cystadenomatous (n=24), to proliferative (n=13), to carcinomatous (n=6); some tumors had admixtures of these patterns. One tumor had a goblet cell carcinoidlike pattern with pseudomyxoma ovarii. Three carcinomas had a signet ring cell component. Cystadenomatous tumors without pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=15) exhibited all possible CK7/CK20 coordinate expression profiles with nearly equal frequency. All proliferative tumors without pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=8) expressed CK7, most often in combination with CK20 expression. All cystadenomatous and proliferative tumors with pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=9 and n=5) were CK7-/CK20+. All carcinomatous tumors had pseudomyxoma ovarii; 3 were CK7-/CK20+, 2 were CK7+/CK20+, and 1 was CK7+/CK20-. The presence of pseudomyxoma ovarii was significantly associated with a CK7-/CK20+ profile (86% with pseudomyxoma ovarii vs. 13% without, P<0.0001), CDX2 positivity (79% vs. 0%, P<0.0001), and villin positivity (57% vs. 5%, P=0.0009). A subset of mucinous tumors associated with mature cystic teratomas exhibiting morphologic and immunohistochemical features of lower intestinal tract-type mucinous tumors may be teratomatous in origin. In practice, the more common diagnosis of secondary involvement by a lower intestinal tract mucinous tumor should be addressed in the pathology report and in subsequent clinical evaluation; interpretation as a true primary ovarian mucinous tumor of teratomatous origin can be considered as an alternative diagnosis when evaluation and follow-up fail to identify a nonovarian source of the mucinous tumor.
Those tumors having CK7 expression with or without CK20 expression may be derived from upper gastrointestinal tract-type or sinonasal-type teratomatous elements but could be independent tumors of surface epithelial-stromal origin.
CLINICAL VARIANTS CHARACTERIZATION
TUMOR TYPE GROSS APPEARANCE HISTOLOGIC APPEARANCE Benign cystadenomas Multilocular and may grow to 30 cm or more
Thin walls with thick to watery mucinous fluid
Bilateral <5%Epithelial lining resembles endocervical epithelium and less commonly intestinal epithelium with goblet cells Borderline malignancy Papillae with solid areas
Necrosis and hemorrhage
Mullerian type tumors are usually unilocular
Bilateral 5-10%Two histologic types:
Mullerian (Endocervical)-Papillae resembling serous borderline tumors with endocervical lining
May have extensive cellular stratification
Extensive acute inflammation
Intestinal-85-90% of tumors
Papillae uncommon and if present tend to be filiform and branching
Nuclear stratification usually less than 4 layersCystadenocarcinomas Papillae with solid areas
Necrosis and hemorrhage
Bilateral 5-10% but mullerian type tumors are more often bilateral than intestinal type (40% vs 6%)May vary from solid to cystic areas and mullerian or intestinal differentiation usually cannot be discerned
Invasion into the underlying stroma
SPECIAL STAINS/IMMUNO-HISTOCHEMISTRY
CHARACTERIZATION
CDX2
Immunohistochemical expression of CDX2 in primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous carcinomas involving the ovary: comparison with CK20 and correlation with coordinate expression of CK7.[1] 1Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA [2] 2Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2006 Nov;19(11):1421-8. Epub 2006 Sep 15 Abstract quote
Recent studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the value of CDX2 for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from metastatic mucinous carcinomas in the ovary. Utility of coordinate expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 is restricted to distinction of ovarian mucinous tumors from lower gastrointestinal tract metastases and data comparing coordinate expression of all three markers is limited.
Immunohistochemical studies were performed to compare expression of CDX2 and cytokeratin 20, both markers of intestinal differentiation, in conjunction with coordinate expression of cytokeratin 7, in 90 mucinous tumors involving the ovary: 42 primary ovarian mucinous tumors (31 atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors (gastrointestinal type), 11 mucinous carcinomas) and 48 metastatic mucinous carcinomas of upper (pancreaticobiliary tract: 14; stomach: five) and lower (colon and rectum: 25; appendix: four) gastrointestinal tract origin. Primary ovarian tumors expressed CDX2 (40%) less frequently than cytokeratin 20 (83%) (P<0.0001). CDX2 expression in primary ovarian tumors (40%) was lower than CDX2 expression in metastatic carcinomas of both upper (74%; P=0.016) and lower gastrointestinal tract origin (90%; P<0.0001). Cytokeratin 20 expression was similar in primary ovarian tumors (83%) and metastases of upper (89%; P=0.071) and lower gastrointestinal tract origin (93%; P=0.29).
Thus, as a single marker CDX2 offers some advantage over cytokeratin 20 because it is less frequently positive in primary ovarian tumors. In the almost universally cytokeratin 7-positive primary ovarian tumors and metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin, CDX2 coordinate expression was less common in primary ovarian tumors (36%) than in metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin (63%) (P=0.022) whereas cytokeratin 20 coordinate expression was identical in both tumor types (79%). In the almost universally cytokeratin 7-negative metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin, coordinate expression of CDX2 (83%) and cytokeratin 20 (86%) were equivalent (P=1.00). CDX2 was comparable to cytokeratin 20 in distinguishing metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin (usually cytokeratin 7-negative and CDX2/cytokeratin 20 positive) from primary ovarian tumors and metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin (usually cytokeratin 7-positive and CDX2/cytokeratin 20 variable). CDX2 provided some advantage over cytokeratin 20 for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from metastases of upper but not lower gastrointestinal tract origin; however, the advantage in the former was limited due to the occurrence of shared coordinate expression profiles in both tumor types.
Cytokeratin 7 provides the predominant discriminatory value among these markers yet is limited to distinction of primary ovarian tumors from metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS KEY DIFFERENTIATING FEATURES CARCINOMA Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1447-1464.
Presence of one of the following strongly suggests and the presence of two or more establishes the diagnosis of metastasis to the ovaryRecent history or operative finding of GI, pancreatic, or biliary tract mucinous adenocarcinoma Parenchymal liver metastases and/or mesenteric lymph node metastases (except in cases of extensive intra-abdominal disease) Bilateral ovarian parenchymal involvement Multiple distinct nodules in ovarian tumors Vascular space invasion within ovary Lack of staining for cytokeratin 7 Benign appearing, borderline-appearing, or both with dissecting mucin present in the abdominal cavity If a mucinous tumor is found in the appendix, it should be considered primary and staged according to the criteria similar to those used for primary intestinal tumors in general
The ovarian tumor(s) should be considered metastatic.
If the ovarian tumor is bilateral, or unilateral in the absence of an accompanying dermoid cyst, it should be considered metastatic from the appendix unless removal of the latter followed by step sectioning of the entire organ for microscopic examination fails to reveal a mucinous tumor If the ovarian tumor is unilateral and associated with a dermoid cyst in the absence of any evidence of an appendiceal tumor, the ovarian tumor should be considered primary Ovarian tumor should be considered primary if the appendix has been removed previously and showed no gross or microscopic evidence of a mucinous tumor, and there was no evidence of mucin in the abdominal cavity at the time of the appendectomy NOTE:In evaluating involvement of the peritoneum, mucinous ascites and superficial organizing intra-abdominal mucin that contains tumor cells should not be considered peritoneal spread of tumor.
In such cases if the ovarian tumor is judged to be primary, it should be placed in the FIGO Ic (TNM TIc category) in the absence of more advanced disease; if an intestinal tumor is judged to be primary, on the other hand, the tumor should be placed in the TNM T4 stage.
Dissecting mucin with fibrosis makes an ovarian tumor FIGO stage 2 or 3 (TNM T2 or T3); if an intestinal tumor is judged primary, the presence of dissecting mucin with fibrosis makes it TNM stage 4.
The presence or absence of cells in the peritoneal biopsy specimens, and if cells are present, whether they appear benign, borderline (atypical), or malignant should be noted in the pathology report METASTATIC TUMORS
Cytokeratins 7 and 20 in Primary and Secondary Mucinous Tumors of the Ovary: Analysis of Coordinate Immunohistochemical Expression Profiles and Staining Distribution in 179 Cases.Departments of *Pathology daggerGynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD double daggerPhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle, WA section signArmed Forces Institute of Pathology (Department of GYN and Breast Pathology); (Current address: Dr Wheeler, Quest Diagnostics, Inc, Las Vegas, NV) parallelWashington Hospital Center (Department of Pathology), Washington, DC.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Sep;30(9):1130-1139. Abstract quote
Coordinate expression profiles for cytokeratins 7 and 20 (CK7 and CK20) are useful for distinguishing certain types of adenocarcinomas but use for distinction of primary and secondary mucinous tumors in the ovary is limited due to the existence of a number of tumor types exhibiting overlapping CK7/CK20 immunoprofiles; the use of staining distribution patterns in the distinction of tumors with shared profiles has not been evaluated in detail.
We report analysis of both coordinate expression profiles and staining distribution in 179 rigorously classified mucinous tumors in the ovary, including 53 primary tumors [35 atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors of gastrointestinal type and 18 invasive mucinous carcinomas] and 126 secondary tumors [28 colorectal adenocarcinomas, 54 appendiceal tumors (23 adenocarcinomas, 31 low-grade adenomatous mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei), 14 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 8 endocervical adenocarcinomas, 5 gastric adenocarcinomas, 4 gallbladder/biliary tract adenocarcinomas, and 13 adenocarcinomas of unknown primary sites). A CK7/CK20 immunoprofile was the most common profile in primary ovarian tumors (74%), upper gastrointestinal tract tumors (78%), and endocervical tumors (88%) but was occasionally observed in lower intestinal tract tumors (colorectal: 11%; appendiceal: 13% of low-grade tumors, 35% of carcinomas). A CK7/CK20 immunoprofile was the most common profile in lower intestinal tract tumors (79%) and was uncommon in upper gastrointestinal tract tumors (9%), rarely seen in primary ovarian tumors (4%), and not seen in endocervical tumors. A CK7/CK20 profile was observed in some primary ovarian (23%), upper gastrointestinal tract (13%), and endocervical tumors (13%) but not in lower intestinal tract tumors.
For CK7 tumors, staining distribution was very frequently diffuse (>50% of tumors cells positive) in primary ovarian, upper gastrointestinal tract, and endocervical tumors, whereas staining distribution was often focal (<50% of tumors cells positive) when present in colorectal and appendiceal carcinomas but not in low-grade appendiceal tumors.
For CK20 tumors, staining distribution was variable but often focal in primary ovarian tumors and nonlower intestinal tract tumors, whereas the pattern was almost always diffuse in lower intestinal tract tumors. Immunohistochemical staining distribution can supplement CK7/CK20 coordinate expression profiles to distinguish subsets of primary ovarian and metastatic lower intestinal tract mucinous tumors having overlapping immunoprofiles but neither coordinate expression profiles nor staining distribution distinguishes primary ovarian tumors from the nonlower intestinal tract metastases.
Primary and metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas in the ovaries: incidence in routine practice with a new approach to improve intraoperative diagnosis.Seidman JD, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Jul;27(7):985-93 Abstract quote Mucinous carcinomas are reported to comprise 6-25% of ovarian carcinomas (mean 12%), but recent refinements in the interpretation of histologic features of noninvasive and metastatic mucinous carcinomas suggest that this may be an overestimate. Mucinous carcinomas in the ovaries are commonly metastatic, but the proportion of primary versus metastatic mucinous carcinomas in unselected patients is unknown.
To evaluate the histologic-type distribution of ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas, a consecutive series of 124 ovarian carcinomas was reviewed using uniform current criteria. Microinvasive and intraepithelial carcinomas and carcinomas arising in germ cell and stromal tumors were excluded. To evaluate the proportions of primary and metastatic tumors among the mucinous carcinomas, 52 consecutive mucinous carcinomas from nonreferral patients were reviewed. Three of 124 primary ovarian carcinomas were pure mucinous carcinomas (2.4%). Among 52 cases of mucinous carcinomas in the ovaries, 40 (77%) were metastatic and 12 (23%) were primary. Among the 12 primary mucinous tumors, three were atypical proliferative mucinous tumors with microinvasion and nine were invasive mucinous carcinomas. Among the 40 metastatic mucinous tumors, 18 (45%) were from the gastrointestinal tract, 8 (20%) were pancreatic, 7 (18%) were gynecologic malignancies (5 cervical, 2 endometrial), 3 (8%) were from the breast, and 4 (10%) were of unknown primary site.
A simple rule that classifies all bilateral mucinous carcinomas as metastatic, unilateral mucinous carcinomas <10 cm as metastatic, and unilateral mucinous carcinomas >/=10 cm as primary correctly classified 90% of the neoplasms. This algorithm for distinguishing primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas in the ovary can be used at the time of intraoperative consultation to guide surgical management.
After careful exclusion of noninvasive, microinvasive, and metastatic tumors, pure mucinous adenocarcinoma primary in the ovary appears to be substantially less common than previously reported.
The distinction between primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas of the ovary: gross and histologic findings in 50 cases.Lee KR, Young RH.
Am J Surg Pathol 2003 Mar;27(3):281-92 Abstract quote The gross and routine microscopic features of 25 stage I primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas without clinical evidence of recurrence and 25 mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovaries were compared.
Findings that were frequent in the latter and strongly favored a metastasis were: 1) bilaterality, 2) microscopic surface involvement by epithelial cells (surface implants), and 3) an infiltrative pattern of stromal invasion. Findings that were less frequent but present exclusively or almost exclusively in metastatic carcinomas were: 1) a nodular invasive pattern, 2) ovarian hilar involvement, 3) single cell invasion, 4) signet-ring cells, 5) vascular invasion, and 6) microscopic surface mucin. Findings that were frequent in, and strongly favored, primary ovarian carcinoma were: 1) an "expansile" pattern of invasion and 2) a complex papillary pattern.
Findings that were less frequent but also favored a primary tumor were: 1) size >10 cm, 2) a smooth external surface, 3) benign-appearing and borderline-appearing areas, 4) microscopic cystic glands, and 5) necrotic luminal debris. Findings that did not distinguish the tumors were: 1) a cystic gross appearance, 2) gross solid, papillary, necrotic, or hemorrhagic areas, 3) nature of cyst contents (mucinous vs nonmucinous), 4) stromal mucin (pseudomyxoma ovarii), 5) cribriform, villous, or solid growth patterns, 6) focal area resembling typical colonic carcinoma, 7) goblet cells, or 8) tumor grade. Primary and metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinomas can be distinguished from each other in the great majority of cases based solely on their conventional histopathologic findings.
Careful gross evaluation is also important with special attention paid to the external surface of the ovarian tumor(s) to detect abnormalities that have the features of surface implants on microscopic evaluation.
Expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary carcinomas of the stomach and colorectum and their value in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas to the ovary.Park SY, Kim HS, Hong EK, Kim WH.
Center for Colorectal Cancer, Center for Gastric Cancer, and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea and the Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hum Pathol 2002 Nov;33(11):1078-85 Abstract quote The expressions of cytokeratin (CK) 7 and 20 have been studied in various primary and metastatic carcinomas, and their determination may help distinguish the site of origin of metastatic carcinomas. However, little is known about the factors that determine variations in their expression patterns in primary gastric and colorectal carcinomas.
We investigated the expressions of CK7 and CK20 in 289 cases of gastric carcinoma and 225 cases of colorectal carcinoma using a tissue microarray. To evaluate CK7 and CK20 expression patterns of ovarian metastases from gastric or colorectal carcinomas, 54 cases of metastatic carcinomas to the ovary were examined. It was found that 71% (207 of 289) of the gastric carcinomas stained positively for CK7, whereas only 9% (21 of 225) of the colorectal carcinomas proved to be CK7 positive, and that 41% (117 of 289) of the gastric carcinomas and 73% (165 of 225) of the colorectal carcinomas were CK20 positive.
The proportion of CK7+/CK20- was highest in the gastric carcinomas at 46% (132 of 289), and was independent of the histologic classification of Lauren (46% of the intestinal type, 45% of the diffuse type). The CK7 and CK20 expression patterns were different in colorectal carcinomas according to histologic grade and location of the tumor. CK7-/CK20+ had the greatest proportion (68%) in colorectal carcinomas, and this was dependent on the tumor's histologic grade (75% of low-grade versus 52% of high-grade) and location (46% of right-sided versus 76% of left-sided). Moreover, 42% (18 of 43) of gastric carcinomas metastatic to the ovary were CK7+/CK20-, whereas 19% (8 of 43) were CK7-/CK20+. All colorectal cancers metastatic to the ovary were CK7-/CK20+, except 1 case that was CK7-/CK20-.
In conclusion, the CK7 and CK20 expression patterns in primary gastric carcinomas vary considerably, and those in colorectal carcinomas are associated with histologic grade and tumor location. The CK7-/CK20+ expression pattern is specific for metastatic colorectal carcinomas to the ovary, but has low predictability for colorectal origin in metastatic ovarian carcinoma.
PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT CHARACTERIZATION HISTOPATHOLOGY
- Invasion patterns in stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas: a clinicopathologic analysis emphasizing favorable outcomes in carcinomas without destructive stromal invasion and the occasional malignant course of carcinomas with limited destructive stromal invasion.
Chen S, Leitao MM, Tornos C, Soslow RA.
1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2005 Jul;18(7):903-11. Abstract quote
Stage I, low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas have an excellent prognosis. Published data have suggested that destructive stromal invasion, a relatively uncommon finding in these tumors, is a poor prognostic factor.
We investigated this by studying all FIGO stage I, grades 1 and 2 (of 3) endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas that were surgically staged at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000. We undertook a careful review of all available slides using current diagnostic criteria and correlated histopathologic indices with clinical outcome data. Cases studied included 13 endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (stage IA, eight; stage IC, five) and six intestinal mucinous ovarian carcinomas (stage IA, three; stage IC, three).
All of the tumors contained areas of expansile invasion, greater than that acceptable for microinvasion, and were thus diagnosed as carcinomas instead of borderline tumors. Nevertheless, nearly all demonstrated borderline tumor (noninvasive) components. Six tumors contained at least one focus of destructive stromal invasion (two endometrioid and four mucinous ovarian carcinomas). Four additional cases showed a focus suspicious for but not diagnostic of destructive invasion ('indeterminate for destructive invasion') (two endometrioid and two mucinous ovarian carcinomas). Follow-up data were available for 17 patients. The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 9-161 months). In all, 14 patients were alive with no evidence of disease (expansile invasion alone, eight; destructive stromal invasion, four; and indeterminate for destructive invasion, two). Three patients died of their disease (destructive stromal invasion, two; and indeterminate for destructive invasion, one). The size, number, and nuclear grade of destructive stromal invasion foci did not appear to have an impact on survival in this relatively limited number of patients.
Outcome data in patients with stage I, low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas without destructive stromal invasion indicate that these tumors have a very limited malignant potential. The literature has not documented recurrences in this setting when the staging has been complete, the sampling adequate, and the cytologic features no more than grade 2, and metastasis to the ovary has been excluded. In contrast, carcinomas harboring even limited foci of destructive stromal invasion, although frequently cured surgically, can pursue a malignant clinical course.Mucinous Tumors of the Ovary
A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 75 Borderline Tumors (of Intestinal Type) and CarcinomasIngrid M. Rodríguez, M.D. ; Jaime Prat, M.D. , F.R.C.Path.
From the Department of Pathology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:139-152 Abstract quote With the exception of benign cystadenomas, mucinous ovarian tumors are rare and heterogeneous neoplasms. They have been classified as either borderline tumors or carcinomas for almost 30 years. Subsequently, the borderline tumors have been subclassified into endocervical-like and intestinal types. The diagnostic criteria for distinguishing borderline tumors of the intestinal type from mucinous carcinomas have varied, making difficult the interpretation of prognostic information. More recently, a further subdivision of the former tumors into forms with only epithelial atypia and variants with focal intraepithelial carcinoma has been proposed.
Consequently, in this study of 41 mucinous borderline tumors of intestinal type and 34 mucinous carcinomas, the former were also subdivided into 30 cases with mild to moderate atypia only and 11 with areas of intraepithelial carcinoma.
All 30 purely borderline tumors were stage I tumors, and all 15 with follow-up information (including one case with microinvasion) were clinically benign. All 11 mucinous borderline tumors that had foci of intraepithelial carcinoma were also stage I neoplasms, and none of the eight patients with follow-up data (including one with microinvasive carcinoma) recurred.
Thirty-four invasive carcinomas were subclassified into 15 expansile and 19 infiltrative subtypes. All 15 carcinomas with only expansile invasion were stage I; none of the 11 with follow-up data recurred. Three of nine patients with stage I infiltrative carcinomas with follow-up information had a fatal recurrence. Eight of the remaining 10 infiltrative carcinomas had extended beyond the ovary at the time of diagnosis (stages II and III); of the six patients with follow-up data, four died of tumor and two were alive with disease.
In stage I carcinomas nuclear grade and tumor rupture correlated with unfavorable prognosis, but less than infiltrative invasion. However, all three fatal tumors were infiltrative carcinomas that had ruptured, and two contained grade 3 malignant nuclei.
Combination of infiltrative invasion, high nuclear grade, and tumor rupture is a strong predictor of recurrence for stage I mucinous ovarian tumors. Among the 19 infiltrative tumors, 13 contained foci of anaplastic carcinoma. Of the seven patients with stage I tumors and follow-up data, only one patient whose tumor had ruptured intraoperatively had a fatal recurrence. The presence of anaplastic components in stage Ia (intact) carcinomas did not have an adverse effect in their outcome, even when the undifferentiated carcinomatous elements appeared in the form of mural nodules.
TREATMENT Dependent upon the stage Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1447-1464.
Macpherson and Pincus. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. Twentyfirst Edition. WB Saunders. 2006.
Rosai J. Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. Ninth Edition. Mosby 2004.
Sternberg S. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Fourth Edition. Lipincott Williams and Wilkins 2004.
Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Seventh Edition. WB Saunders 2005.
DeMay RM. The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Volume 1 and 2. ASCP Press. 1996.
Weedon D. Weedon's Skin Pathology Second Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2002
Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill. 2003.
Weiss SW and Goldblum JR. Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. Fourth Edition. Mosby 2001.
Basic Principles of Disease
Learn the basic disease classifications of cancers, infections, and inflammation
Commonly Used Terms
This is a glossary of terms often found in a pathology report.Diagnostic Process
Learn how a pathologist makes a diagnosis using a microscopeSurgical Pathology Report
Examine an actual biopsy report to understand what each section meansSpecial Stains
Understand the tools the pathologist utilizes to aid in the diagnosisHow Accurate is My Report?
Pathologists actively oversee every area of the laboratory to ensure your report is accurate
Got Path?
Recent teaching cases and lectures presented in conferences
Last Updated June 7, 2007
Send mail to The Doctor's Doctor with questions or comments about this web site.
Read the Medical Disclaimer.
Copyright © The Doctor's Doctor