Background
Keratoacanthomas resemble squamous cell carcinomas both clinically and histologically. They are usually nodules with a scaly central plug. Characteristically, there is a history of rapid onset with growth to 1-2 cm over a period of 1-2 months. If undisturbed, many will spontaneously involute or regress after 3-6 months. Thus, the term self-healing squamous cell carcinoma was once applied to this lesion. These are tumors of males in their 6-7th decades.
As one might surmise by some of the other names for this tumor, there may be considerable difficulty in distinguishing this tumor from a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. The pathologist has the task of determining whether this tumor is a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Although numerous studies have addressed this issue, it is still a difficult distinction. This is complicated by the fact that cases diagnosed of keratoacanthoma subsequently were diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma, based upon their behavior. Possible explanations for this include an initial erroneous diagnosis, a tumor with combined features of both keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma, transformation of the keratoacanthoma into a squamous cell carcinoma, or the keratoacanthoma may actually be a variant of a squamous cell carcinoma. This last hypothesis has engendered considerable controversy in dermatopathology. If it is true, then keratoacanthomas may represent a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with a peculiar tendency to undergo regression. To further complicate this story, there are cases reports of keratoacanthomas which have metastasized. If these cases can be substantiated, this would lend credence to this last hypothesis.
Ideally, the pathologist should receive a full thickness excision of the entire lesion so that the characteristic architecture and cytology can be appreciated. More often, a superficial shave biopsy is obtained. In these cases, it is sometimes impossible to make the distinction from a squamous cell carcinoma and a request for a deeper wider biopsy may be indicated.
OUTLINE
PATHOGENESIS CHARACTERIZATION HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS
Identification of human papillomavirus in keratoacanthomas.Forslund O, DeAngelis PM, Beigi M, Schjolberg AR, Clausen OP.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Malmo University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden, and Institute and Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
J Cutan Pathol. 2003 Aug;30(7):423-9 Abstract quote BACKGROUND: Keratoacanthomas are benign, clinically distinct skin tumors that may infiltrate and show cellular atypia. A viral etiology has been suggested, and the aim was to search for human papillomavirus (HPV) in keratoacanthomas.
METHODS: From 21 immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients and 11 non-immunosuppressed patients, 72 fresh biopsies with diagnosis of keratoacanthomas were analyzed. For detection of cutaneous and genital HPV DNA, single-tube nested 'hanging droplet' polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and another PCR (GP5+ and 6+) were used, respectively.
RESULTS: Among 21 immunosuppressed patients, 71% (15/21) harbored HPV DNA at least in one sample. Of the keratoacanthoma lesions, 55% (33/60) were HPV DNA positive. Fourteen samples from eight immunosuppressed patients contained HPV types 5, 9, 10, 14, 19, 20, 21, 38, 49, 80, putative HPV types as HPVvs20-4, HPVvs75, and HPVvs92 and FA16.1, FA23.2, FA37, FA75, and FA81. Among 11 non-immunosuppressed patients, 36% (4/11) harbored HPV DNA at least in one sample, and 33% (4/12) of their keratoacanthomas were HPV DNA positive. In total, HPV DNA was detected in 51% (37/72) of the keratoacanthomas.
CONCLUSIONS: By the use of PCR, cutaneous HPV DNA was detected in 51% (37/72) of the keratoacanthomas. No predominating HPV type or genital HPV type was identified. The role of HPV in keratoacanthomas remains thus elusive.
METALLOPROTEINASES
Transformation-specific matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-7 and MMP-13, are present in epithelial cells of keratoacanthomas.1Department of Dermatology, Helsinki University Central Hospital and Biomedicum Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mod Pathol. 2006 Sep;19(9):1203-12. Abstract quote
Keratoacanthomas are rapidly growing hyperproliferative skin tumors that may clinically or histologically be difficult to distinguish from well-differentiated squamous cell cancers (SCCs). UV light, trauma, and immune suppression represent their etiological factors. As matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are implicated at all stages of tumorigenesis, we investigated the expression profile of several cancer-related MMPs to find markers that would differentiate keratoacanthomas from SCCs and shed light to the pathobiology of keratoacanthoma. Samples from 31 keratoacanthomas and 15 grade I SCCs were studied using immunohistochemistry for MMP-2, -7, -8, -9, -10, -13, and -19 and p16 and laminin-5gamma2 chain. In situ hybridization for MMP-7, -10, and -13 was performed in a subset of tumors. Keratinocytes with atypia, presence of neovascularization, and composition of the inflammatory infiltrate were graded from hematoxylin-eosin stainings. MMP-7 was present in the epithelium of 4/31 keratoacanthomas and 9/15 SCCs, MMP-8 in 3/30 keratoacanthomas and 0/15 SCCs, but MMP-13 in 16/31 keratoacanthomas and 10/15 SCCs, and MMP-10 in 28/31 keratoacanthomas and all cancers. MMP-9 was detected in the epithelium in 5/31 keratoacanthomas and 8/15 SCCs, whereas MMP-2 was only present in fibroblasts in both tumors. MMP-19 was upregulated in proliferating epithelium of keratoacanthomas as was p16. Cytoplasmic laminin-5gamma2 was particularly abundant in keratinocytes at the pushing border of MMP-13-positive keratoacanthomas.
We conclude that although some MMPs (MMP-10 and -13) are abundantly expressed in keratoacanthomas, the presence of MMP-7 and -9 in their epithelial pushing border is rare and should raise suspicion of SCC. Further, the loss of MMP-19 and p16 could aid in making the differential diagnosis between well-differentiated SCC and keratoacanthoma. Frequent expression of the transformation-specific MMP-13 in keratoacanthomas suggests that they are not benign tumors but incomplete SCCs.MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY
Assessment of microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in sporadic keratoacanthomas.Langenbach N, Kroiss MM, Ruschoff J, Schlegel J, Landthaler M, Stolz W.
Department of Dermatology, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Arch Dermatol Res 1999 Jan;291(1):1-5 Abstract quote Variations in the length of simple repetitive tandem repeats (microsatellite instability, MIN) between constitutive and tumour DNA, which is characteristic of tumours in patients affected with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), have been found to be very important in the carcinogenesis of a variety of human neoplasms. Recently, MIN has been found in sebaceous and colorectal tumours as well as in keratoacanthomas of Muir-Torre syndrome.
In order to elucidate the significance of both MIN and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the pathogenesis of sporadic keratoacanthomas, the presence of MIN and LOH at five loci [chromosome 5q21 (D5S346, APC), 9p21 (D9S171, p16), 10pter (D10S89, Mfd28), 11p (D11S904) and 17p12 (D17S520, p53)] was evaluated. MIN was found at only one locus (p53) in 1 of 12 keratoacanthomas and no evidence for the presence of LOH could be detected.
Our results suggest that, in contrast to keratoacanthomas associated with Muir-Torre syndrome, neither MIN nor LOH appear to be significant in the induction of sporadic keratoacanthomas.
DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS CHARACTERIZATION Muir-Torre syndrome Association with internal malignancies and multiple sebaceous tumors
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS KEY DIFFERENTIATING FEATURES INFUNDIBULOCYSTIC
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
Keratoacanthoma and infundibulocystic squamous cell carcinoma.Skin and Cancer Foundation Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Am J Dermatopathol. 2008 Apr;30(2):127-34. Abstract quote
One of the major controversies in dermatopathology is the relationship of keratoacanthoma to squamous cell carcinoma. Leaders in the field remain polarized in their views. Carcinomas with distinct follicular pattern of differentiation have been described in reference to the isthmus as trichilemmal carcinomas, to the follicular bulb as pilomatricomal carcinomas, and to the stem cell or rapidly amplifying cell compartment as basal cell carcinomas (trichoblastic carcinomas).
We have employed the term infundibulocystic or infundibular squamous cell carcinoma to identify a subset of squamous cell carcinomas that demonstrate this pattern of differentiation. The recognition of infundibular squamous cell carcinoma is important in that well-differentiated examples are likely to have been diagnosed as keratoacanthoma, whereas moderately or poorly differentiated tumors would be more often reported as squamous cell carcinomas, leading to underrecognition of these infundibular variants of squamous cell carcinoma.
The descriptive term infundibulocystic or infundibular squamous cell carcinoma may help to better define an alternative follicular-based pathway to squamous cell carcinoma distinct from the more common evolution from solar keratoses and also refine the classification of keratoacanthoma.SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
VCAM (CD-106) and ICAM (CD-54) Adhesion Molecules Distinguish Keratoacanthomas from Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas.Melendez ND, Smoller BR, Morgan M.
Department of Pathology (N.D.M.M.M.), University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, and James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital.
Mod Pathol 2003 Jan;16(1):8-13 Abstract quote Keratoacanthomas are rapidly growing benign epithelial derived neoplasms that may evolve into squamous cell carcinomas, or represent a variant of squamous cell carcinoma. ICAM (CD-54) is a ligand for the cell adhesion receptor LFA-1, shown to be important in immune stimulation that is upgraded in inflammatory cutaneous disorders. VCAM (CD-106) is an adhesion molecule normally found in stimulated endothelium, that plays a critical role in the migration of leukocytes.
We examined the immunohistochemical expression of ICAM (CD-54) and VCAM (CD-106) in a series of 50 evolving, fully developed, resolving keratoacanthoma and well-differentiated and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma to evaluate the possible temporal and pathogenic relation of these immune recognition markers and epithelial derived tumors. ICAM (CD-54) showed an increase in expression in the fully developed keratoacanthoma and was absent in the evolving and resolved keratoacanthoma.
In the squamous cell carcinomas, expression was focally observed in the well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas with a dramatic increase seen in the poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. Similarly, VCAM (CD-106) was expressed in the fully developed keratoacanthoma and was absent in the evolving and resolved keratoacanthoma. Moderate expression for VCAM (CD-106) was seen in the well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, and intense expression was seen in the fully developed keratoacanthoma and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. As a group, keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma are immunophenotypically distinct. There is a temporal related increase in expression of VCAM (CD-106) in conjunction with the evolution of keratoacanthoma. Increased expression of both markers is seen with squamous cell carcinoma dedifferentiation.
Application of these markers might be an important adjunct in predicting the biologic behavior and pathogenesis of these lesions.
PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT PROGNOSIS SYNDECAN-1 Level of Syndecan-1 Expression is a Distinguishing Feature in Behavior between Keratoacanthoma and Invasive Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Perkins Mukunyadzi, M.D., Ralph D. Sanderson, Ph.D., Chun-Yang Fan, M.D., Ph.D. and Bruce R. Smoller, M.D.
Departments of Pathology (PM, RDS, CYF, BS) and Dermatology (BRS), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas
Mod Pathol 2002;15:45-49 Abstract quote
Keratoacanthoma (KA) resolves spontaneously but is regarded by some as a variant of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, others consider KA a totally benign entity. Syndecan-1 is one of the heparan sulfate proteoglycans that mediates intercellular and cell to matrix adhesion. Its expression appears to be inversely correlated with tumor aggressiveness and invasiveness. Previous studies have shown decreased levels of syndecan-1 expression in invasive cutaneous SCC, correlating with tumor de-differentiation. However, a similar study has never been done on KA.
To investigate syndecan-1 expression in classic KA and compare the results with those of classic invasive SCC, 24 KAs were immunostained for syndecan-1 (CD 138) using the monoclonal antibody B-B4 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Results were semi-quantitatively scored as either negative or positive (mild, moderate, or strong) and compared with those previously obtained on 23 invasive SCC and in situ lesions. All 24 KAs were positive for syndecan-1 expression. Staining intensity of 18 cases was comparable with that of SCC in situ or adjacent normal epidermis. By comparison, invasive SCC showed significantly diminished staining. Reduced staining in focal areas of cytologic atypia at the base was present in three KAs.
Syndecan-1 expression in KA mirrors that of SCC in situ and normal epidermis, providing a molecular basis that biologically KA may be closely related to SCC in situ but distinctively different from invasive SCC.
TREATMENT Simple excision Macpherson and Pincus. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. Twentyfirst Edition. WB Saunders. 2006.
Rosai J. Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. Ninth Edition. Mosby 2004.
Sternberg S. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Fourth Edition. Lipincott Williams and Wilkins 2004.
Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Seventh Edition. WB Saunders 2005.
DeMay RM. The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Volume 1 and 2. ASCP Press. 1996.
Weedon D. Weedon's Skin Pathology Second Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2002
Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill. 2003.
Weiss SW and Goldblum JR. Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. Fifth Edition. Mosby Elesevier 2008
Regression-Biological phenomenon whereby the host inflammatory response attacks the tumor and destroys it.
Basic Principles of Disease
Learn the basic disease classifications of cancers, infections, and inflammation
Commonly Used Terms
This is a glossary of terms often found in a pathology report.Diagnostic Process
Learn how a pathologist makes a diagnosis using a microscopeSurgical Pathology Report
Examine an actual biopsy report to understand what each section meansSpecial Stains
Understand the tools the pathologist utilizes to aid in the diagnosisHow Accurate is My Report?
Pathologists actively oversee every area of the laboratory to ensure your report is accurate
Got Path?
Recent teaching cases and lectures presented in conferences
Last Updated March 28, 2008
Send
mail to The Doctor's Doctor with
questions or comments about this web site.
Read the Medical Disclaimer.
Copyright © The Doctor's Doctor